Advertisement
Practice Improvement|Articles in Press

Setting the Stage: Innovation in Port Access Education for Pediatric Emergency Nurses

Published:March 03, 2023DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jen.2023.01.002

      Abstract

      Introduction

      Pediatric port access can be challenging in the emergency department; however, it must be performed promptly and safely. Port education for nurses traditionally includes procedural practice on adult-size, tabletop manikins, which lacks the situational and emotional aspects inherent in pediatrics. The purpose of this foundational study was to describe the knowledge and self-efficacy gain from a simulation curriculum that promotes effective situational dialogue and sterile port access technique, while incorporating a wearable port trainer to enhance simulation fidelity.

      Methods

      An educational intervention impact study was conducted using a curriculum integrating a comprehensive didactic session with simulation. A unique element included a novel port trainer worn by a standardized patient, along with a second actor portraying a distressed parent at the bedside. Participants completed precourse and postcourse surveys on the day of simulation and a 3-month follow-up survey. Sessions were video recorded for review and content analysis.

      Results

      Thirty-four pediatric emergency nurses participated in the program and demonstrated an overall increase in knowledge and self-efficacy with port access that was sustained at the 3-month follow-up. Data revealed positive feedback regarding the participants’ simulation experience.

      Discussion

      Effective port access education for nurses requires a comprehensive curriculum integrating procedural aspects and situational techniques to address the components of a true port access experience involving pediatric patients and families. Our curriculum successfully combined skill-based practice with situational management, and promoted nursing self-efficacy and competence with port access in the pediatric population.

      Key words

      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment

      Purchase one-time access:

      Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online access
      One-time access price info
      • For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
      • For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'

      Subscribe:

      Subscribe to Journal of Emergency Nursing
      Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
      Already an online subscriber? Sign in
      Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect

      References

        • Blanco-Guzman M.O.
        Implanted vascular access device options: a focused review on safety and outcomes.
        Transfusion. 2018; 58: 558-568https://doi.org/10.1111/trf.14503
        • Ullman A.J.
        • Marsh N.
        • Mihala G.
        • Cooke M.
        • Rickard C.M.
        Complications of central venous access devices: a systematic review.
        Pediatrics. 2015; 136: e1331-e1344https://doi.org/10.1542/peds.2015-1507
        • Machat S.
        • Eisenhuber E.
        • Pfarl G.
        • et al.
        Complications of central venous port systems: a pictorial review.
        Insights Imaging. 2019; 10: 1-12
        • Redkar R.
        • Bangar A.
        • Krishnan J.
        • Raj V.
        • Swathi C.
        • Joshi S.
        Role of chemoports in children with hematological/solid tumor malignancies–technical implications and complications: an institutional experience.
        J Indian Assoc Pediatr Surg. 2019; 24: 27-30https://doi.org/10.4103/jiaps.jiaps_212_17
        • Heden L.
        • Von Essen L.
        • Ljungman G.
        Children’s self-reports of fear and pain levels during needle procedures.
        Nurs Open. 2019; 7: 376-382https://doi.org/10.1002/nop2.399
        • Hilarius K.W.
        • Skippen P.W.
        • Kissoon N.
        Early recognition and emergency treatment of sepsis and septic shock in children.
        Pediatr Emerg Care. 2020; 36: 101-106https://doi.org/10.1097/PEC.0000000000002043
        • Marchionni C.
        • Gauthier M.
        • Aube T.
        • Lavoie-Tremblay M.
        Development of a vascular access and infusion nursing curriculum for entry-to-practice baccalaureate students.
        Vasc Access. 2018; 12: 13-22
        • Nibbelink C.W.
        • Brewer B.B.
        Decision-making in nursing practice: an integrative review.
        J Clin Nurs. 2018; 27: 917-928https://doi.org/10.1111/jocn.14151
        • Pinelli F.
        • Cecero E.
        • Degl’Innocenti D.
        • et al.
        Infection of totally implantable venous access devices: a review of the literature.
        J Vasc Access. 2018; 19: 230-242https://doi.org/10.1177/1129729818758999
        • Jizba T.A.
        • Baumert J.M.
        • Miller J.
        • Barnason S.
        Implanted port access in the emergency department: a unit-level feasibility study of a nurse-led port access algorithm.
        J Emerg Nurs. 2021; 47: 599-608https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jen.2021.01.010
        • Jarding E.K.
        • Flynn Makic M.B.
        Central line care and management: adopting evidence-based nursing interventions.
        J Perianesth Nurs. 2021; 36: 328-333https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jopan.2020.10.010
        • Conley S.B.
        • Buckley P.
        • Magarace L.
        • Hsieh C.
        • Pedulla L.V.
        Standardizing best nursing practice for implanted ports: applying evidence-based professional guidelines to prevent central line-associated bloodstream infections.
        J Infus Nurs. 2017; 40: 165-174https://doi.org/10.1097/nan.0000000000000217
        • Devrim I.
        • Oruc Y.
        • Demirag B.
        • et al.
        Central line bundle for prevention of central line-associated bloodstream infection for totally implantable venous access devices (ports) in pediatric cancer patients.
        J Vasc Access. 2018; 19: 358-365https://doi.org/10.1177/1129729818757955
        • Karagiannidou S.
        • Triantafyllou C.
        • Zaoutis T.E.
        • Papaevangelou V.
        • Maniadakis N.
        • Kourlaba G.
        Length of stay, cost, and mortality of healthcare-acquired bloodstream infections in children and neonates: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
        Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2020; 41: 342-354https://doi.org/10.1017/ice.2019.353
      1. Rosselli E, Kuck K, Szabo P. Standardizing education for implanted venous port nurse champions across a healthcare system. Presented at: 47th Annual Oncology Nursing Society Congress; April 27-May 1, 2022; Anaheim, CA.

        • Gause G.
        • Mokgaola I.O.
        • Rakhudu M.A.
        Technology usage for teaching and learning in nursing education: an integrative review.
        Curationis. 2022; 45: e1-e9https://doi.org/10.4102/curationis.v45i1.2261
        • Clerkin R.
        • Patton D.
        • Moore Z.
        • Nugent L.
        • Avsar P.
        • O’Connor T.
        What is the impact of video as a teaching method on achieving psychomotor skills in nursing? A systematic review and meta-analysis.
        Nurse Educ Today. 2022; 111105280https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nedt.2022.105280
        • Tsai S.L.
        • Chai S.K.
        • Hsieh L.F.
        • et al.
        The use of virtual reality computer simulation in learning port-a-cath injection.
        Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract. 2008; 13: 71-87https://doi.org/10.1007/s10459-006-9025-3
        • Chen F.
        • Leng Y.
        • Ge J.
        • et al.
        Effectiveness of virtual reality in nursing education: meta-analysis.
        J Med Internet Res. 2020; 22e18290https://doi.org/10.2196/18290
        • Bai J.
        • Harper F.
        • Penner L.
        • Swanson K.
        • Santacroce S.
        Parents’ verbal and nonverbal caring behaviors and child distress during cancer-related port access procedures: a time-window sequential analysis.
        Oncol Nurs Forum. 2017; 44: 675-687https://doi.org/10.1188/17.onf.675-687
        • O’Brien B.C.
        • Battista A.
        Situated learning theory in health professions education research: a scoping review.
        Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract. 2020; 25: 483-509https://doi.org/10.1007/s10459-019-09900-w
        • Cantrell M.A.
        • Franklin A.
        • Leighton K.
        • Carlson A.
        The evidence in simulation-based learning experiences in nursing education and practice: an umbrella review.
        Clin Simul Nurs. 2017; 13: 634-667https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecns.2017.08.004
        • Wood R.
        • Bandura A.
        Impact of conceptions of ability on self-regulatory mechanisms and complex decision making.
        J Pers Soc Psychol. 1989; 56: 407-415https://doi.org/10.1037//0022-3514.56.3.407
        • Shorey S.
        • Lopez V.
        Self-efficacy in a nursing context.
        in: Haugan G. Eriksson M. Health Promotion in Health Care-Vital Theories and Research. Springer, 2021: 145-158
        • Oh P.J.
        • Jeon K.D.
        • Koh M.S.
        The effects of simulation-based learning using standardized patients in nursing students: a meta-analysis.
        Nurse Educ Today. 2015; 35: e6-e15https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nedt.2015.01.019
        • Holtschneider M.E.
        Expanding the fidelity of standardized patients in simulation by incorporating wearable technology.
        J Nurs Prof Dev. 2017; 33: 320-321https://doi.org/10.1097/NND.0000000000000391
        • Brown W.J.
        • Tortorella R.A.
        Hybrid medical simulation–A systematic literature review.
        Smart Learn Environ. 2020; 7: 1-16https://doi.org/10.1186/s40561-020-00127-6
        • Unver V.
        • Basak T.
        • Ayhan H.
        • et al.
        Integrating simulation based learning into nursing education programs: hybrid simulation.
        Technol Health Care. 2018; 26: 263-270https://doi.org/10.3233/THC-170853
        • Chen G.
        • Gully S.M.
        • Eden D.
        Validation of a new general self-efficacy scale.
        Organ Res Methods. 2001; 4: 62-83https://doi.org/10.1177/109442810141004
        • Leighton K.
        • Ravert P.
        • Mudra V.
        • Macintosh C.
        Updating the simulation effectiveness tool: item modifications and reevaluation of psychometric properties.
        Nurs Educ Perspect. 2015; 36: 317-323https://doi.org/10.5480/15-1671
        • Yousif K.I.
        • Abu-Aisha H.
        • Abboud O.I.
        The effect of an educational program for vascular access care on nurses’ knowledge at dialysis centers in Khartoum State, Sudan.
        Saudi J Kidney Dis Transpl. 2017; 28: 1027-1033https://doi.org/10.4103/1319-2442.215149
        • Raynak A.
        • Paquet F.
        • Ruck A.
        • Wood B.
        Knowledge of central venous access devices among nurses in two acute care facilities in Canada.
        Vasc Access. 2018; 12: 6-15
        • DiFine G.
        • Centini G.
        • Gavetti D.
        • et al.
        Best practices in the management of central vascular access devices. An observational study in areas with a high prevalence of trained nurses.
        J Infus Nurs. 2018; 41: 319-325https://doi.org/10.1097/NAN.0000000000000297
        • Raynak A.
        • Paquet F.
        • Marchionni C.
        • Lok V.
        • Gauthier M.
        • Frati F.
        Nurses’ knowledge on routine care and maintenance of adult vascular access devices: a scoping review.
        J Clin Nurs. 2020; 29: 3905-3921https://doi.org/10.1111/jocn.15419
        • Marschall J.
        • Mermel L.A.
        • Fakih M.
        • et al.
        Strategies to prevent central line-associated bloodstream infections in acute care hospitals: 2014 update.
        Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2014; 35: 753-771https://doi.org/10.1086/676533

      Biography

      Denise Downey, Member, Mayflower Chapter, is Nursing Professional Development Specialist, Emergency Services, Boston Children’s Hospital, Boston, MA. Twitter: @DDowneyRN. ORCID identifier: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7974-9764.

      Biography

      Kelsey Graber is PhD Student, Center for Research on Play in Education, Development, and Learning, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK. ORCID identifier: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5238-4251.

      Biography

      Debra Lajoie is Director, Nursing Research Medical, Surgical, Behavioral Health and Emergency Programs, Boston Children’s Hospital, Boston, MA. ORCID identifier: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6192-8345.

      Biography

      Lori Newman is Director of Professional Development in Education, Assistant Professor of Pediatrics, Harvard Medical School, Boston Children’s Hospital, Boston MA. ORCID identifier: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2440-1998.

      Biography

      Peter Weinstock is Executive Director, Immersive Design Systems, Senior Associate, Critical Care Medicine, Chair in Pediatric Simulation, Associate Professor, Harvard Medical School, Boston Children’s Hospital, Boston, MA. ORCID identifier: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4425-3232.